How do we measure learning? Good question. There are many theories to answering this question.
The traditional method of assessing knowledge is based on the learner’s understanding of the content. This can be regurgitating the content or critically thinking and problem solving by using the core principles of the content. This the most used because it’s the most quantifiable. Recently however, technology can assess a learner’s needs and track a learner’s growth in behavior, performance and interest. By understanding these markers, instruction can be adapted to best challenge the learner. Although this has it advantages, the biggest disadvantage is how to keep instruction on pace and in the most effective way. Data and analysis can show the quantitative measurements but how can an instructor adapt for each student? That sounds a little difficult. I guess the best way to think about it is to zoom out a bit larger, maybe an entire program or institution can analyze a larger group of learners to see what’s working at what isn’t.
I remember hearing about UC Santa Cruz was one of the universities that instead of using letter grades, gave their students a written assessment, called a Narrative Evaluation System, to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the student in a particular course. Unfortunately, we are in the era of standardization and simplicity so it’s changed now due to the inability to transfer grades into graduate programs at different schools. Personally, I really like that system though, the growth-mindset approach in measuring learning; you can clearly see where you were and where you are now. It’s empowering and motivating in see such a positive development.
